![]()
SHOP:楽天Kobo電子書籍ストア
6,058円(税込) (送料込) (カード利用可)
| 楽天市場で商品詳細を見る |
<p>Against the background of early modernism - a period that justified punishment by general deterrence - Kant is usually thought to represent a radical turn towards retributivism. For Kant, and later for Fichte and Hegel, a just punishment respects the humanity inherent in the criminal, and serves no external ends - it is instituted only because the criminal deserves it. In this original study, Jean-Christophe Merle uses close analysis of texts to show that these philosophers did not in fact hold a retributivist position, or even a mixed position; instead he traces in their work the gradual emergence of views in favour of deterrence and resocialisation. He also examines Nietzsche's view that morality rests on the rejection of retribution. His final chapter offers a challenge to the retributivist position, and a defence of resocialisation, in the context of current legal theory and practice concerning the punishment of crimes against humanity.</p>画面が切り替わりますので、しばらくお待ち下さい。
※ご購入は、楽天kobo商品...楽天市場のショップで商品詳細の続きを見る